What MRAs do NOT want you to notice: is that she is claiming that feminisms goals and the MRMs goals are the same.
MRAs would have you believe that they are drowning her out because she is a feminist: and they are being truthful about that: her words are very dangerous to them: especially if you hear them and compare them to what MRAs often say
What they do not want you to hear: is her criteria for a social movement: it is in fact nearly identical to what the MRMs criteria is.
Do not believe me: watch it and soak in her words: then go read some MRA blogs
I watched this, and to be honest, I did not think that the men in the crowd were trying to drown her out.
ReplyDeleteIt seems like she was trying to drown them out.
However; your point is taken. Her agenda and the list she was screaming about seems to be coherent with much of the MRM agenda. Or I guess it is the Men's Rights HUMANist agenda or whatever now.
Tis totally fucking lame - and so are most of the people involved.
That chick reminds me of the women I see and hear on the subway every day.
ReplyDeleteBut if Dizzy Dean Esmay, Erin Prizzey, or the rest of the AVfM crew published such a list, no doubt it would be roundly applauded. It sounds a lot like Esmay's recent 'Manifesto for Mens Rights'.
@eric - dang - I just looked that up - I really wish NotAnMRA had left his original manifesto up.
DeleteHe received death threats over it...
NotAnMRA is one of the people I introduced to this movement. He was immediately turned off to it after reading a few "MRA" blogs.
He wrote some points, and I mailed them to leading "MRA's" or anti-feminists.
Dr. Rookh had some good things to say about the e-mails I sent - but that was all.
As I recall, Paul did not respond to them.
MIKE - PUT THAT ORIGINAL MANIFESTO BACK UP!
Too chicken shit!!!!