It has been brought to my attention: that more and more key players in the MRM hoax are simply rehashing feminist ideals and philosophies.
excessive praise of left wing politics.
antagonizing of right wing politics.
excessive praise of gay men.
antagonizing straight men.
antagonizing patriarchal religions.
excessive praise of atheism.
hatred of traditionalism: more specifically: to bash right wing politics or religion: funny isn't it: how people who were not alive many years ago know exactly what life was like so many years ago.
I am gathering clips and essays: the list is overwhelming.
Any MRA reading this will probably say to their self: gee, he is lying: he is making this up: or worse: they will openly admit that feminists (man-haters) were correct about many things.
To those who doubt I say this: open wide: I am going to shove a truck load of feminism and MRAism right down your throat in the near future: and you will not notice a difference in the flavor.
To those who support feminism: which most MRAs do: they just do not realize it: because they equate traditionalism with feminism: you are no friend of men: you are a friend of male hatred.
Sunday, February 3, 2013
Friday, January 4, 2013
The Next Logical Step
Feminism is poisoning Atheism
LMFAO!!!
Yeah: and fascism poisoned the Nazi party.
These left wing apologists and atheist apologists get funnier and funnier by the minute.
Let's see here: what else can I come up with to match Darth Elam's rapier wit:
Racism is poisoning the KKK.
Sexism is poisoning the feminists.
Idiots are poisoning the MRM (which is all in my head).
Lard is poisoning David Futrelle.
Poison is poisoning rat poison.
Who put poison in my poison?
LMFAO!!!
WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!
I do not know who to feel sorry for: the fuckwits who call themselves MRA's: or the feminists.
How about neither: they are all human trash.
God damn: I never laughed so hard in my life!!!
LMFAO!!!
Yeah: and fascism poisoned the Nazi party.
These left wing apologists and atheist apologists get funnier and funnier by the minute.
Let's see here: what else can I come up with to match Darth Elam's rapier wit:
Racism is poisoning the KKK.
Sexism is poisoning the feminists.
Idiots are poisoning the MRM (which is all in my head).
Lard is poisoning David Futrelle.
Poison is poisoning rat poison.
Who put poison in my poison?
LMFAO!!!
WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!
I do not know who to feel sorry for: the fuckwits who call themselves MRA's: or the feminists.
How about neither: they are all human trash.
God damn: I never laughed so hard in my life!!!
Monday, October 15, 2012
MRAs and the MRM: its all in my mind!
Fidelbogen is one of the wackiest craziest guys I know! Here is twat he wrote about me: appropriately written in sweet-pink:
notanmra: Your obsession with "MRA" and "MRM" is totally misplaced.
These things are fictional constructs of your mind, and nothing more.
You are very much like a feminist in that way.
So: all those blogs and people writing mindless rehashings of feminazi tripe: WHO CLEARLY CALL THEMSELVES THESE THINGS: are all my imagination.
I tell you: I never laughed so hard in my life. I was drinking my morning gin getting ready to count beans: and I spit it out all over the company computer.
And oh yeah: I am the one who is like the feminists.
Well fidelbogen sir: this blog is going to dedicate itself to digging up old feminist essays: you will see just how wrong you are. It is the MRAs and the MRM that are like the feminists: I suspect you already know this though: and are scared of what I am going to reveal.
Did you know that Andrea Dworkin's admittedly FAGGOT husband wrote about how "men think with their dicks"?
And: so did Darth Elam.
Read the shit at the top of this blog: the MRM exists: it is fourth wave feminism.
Fidelbogen: I gotta love you: you are one crazy bastard!
notanmra: Your obsession with "MRA" and "MRM" is totally misplaced.
These things are fictional constructs of your mind, and nothing more.
You are very much like a feminist in that way.
So: all those blogs and people writing mindless rehashings of feminazi tripe: WHO CLEARLY CALL THEMSELVES THESE THINGS: are all my imagination.
I tell you: I never laughed so hard in my life. I was drinking my morning gin getting ready to count beans: and I spit it out all over the company computer.
Fidelbogen: one wild and crazy guy!
Well fidelbogen sir: this blog is going to dedicate itself to digging up old feminist essays: you will see just how wrong you are. It is the MRAs and the MRM that are like the feminists: I suspect you already know this though: and are scared of what I am going to reveal.
Did you know that Andrea Dworkin's admittedly FAGGOT husband wrote about how "men think with their dicks"?
And: so did Darth Elam.
Read the shit at the top of this blog: the MRM exists: it is fourth wave feminism.
Fidelbogen: I gotta love you: you are one crazy bastard!
Friday, September 7, 2012
Spot on Again...
"This is why the so-called Men’s Rights movement is not so much a rights movement as a take-away-other-people’s-rights movement."
Words more true were never typed.
That came from David Futrelle. I would trust him to be in charge of men and their rights before I'd trust any Mentally Retarded Asswipe.
Don't believe me?
Check out this video from John the Other: a well known butt-buddy of Darth Elam. Yes: John the Mother is fighting for your right to NOT be religious:
ACTUALLY THAT IS WRONG.
He is fighting against the Christian religion: just like the feminists from days of old did.
Attention to my 3 serious followers: I am digging up old feminist essays: and I will be comparing them to modern day Mentally Retarded Asswipe essays. You will find that the similarities are shocking: especially since none of you have brains.
Words more true were never typed.
That came from David Futrelle. I would trust him to be in charge of men and their rights before I'd trust any Mentally Retarded Asswipe.
Don't believe me?
Check out this video from John the Other: a well known butt-buddy of Darth Elam. Yes: John the Mother is fighting for your right to NOT be religious:
ACTUALLY THAT IS WRONG.
He is fighting against the Christian religion: just like the feminists from days of old did.
Attention to my 3 serious followers: I am digging up old feminist essays: and I will be comparing them to modern day Mentally Retarded Asswipe essays. You will find that the similarities are shocking: especially since none of you have brains.
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Manboobz: More in the Corner of Boys than Mentally Retarded Asswipes (MRA's)
Any spinached chin old fart that suggests that 14 year old boys are somehow capable of seducing them is with no doubt: a complete faggot.
It turns out: that David Futrelle actually caught a comment by such a faggot and posted about it on his shit hole of a blog.
In it: he sites an interview with Father Benedict Groeschel:
Father Benedict Groeschel actually said some very inflammatory things. Some examples include:
Referring to Jerry Sandusky as "That poor guy": poor referring to being caught.
He also claims that young boys will often seek a father figure if they did not have one of their own: which leads to kissing and hugging: and eventually it goes to far or something like that.
Can any Mentally Retarded Asswipes call this man any of the following:
Of course not. Mentally Retarded Asswipes (MRA's) only bash heterosexual men: something that the FAGGOT in the picture above is clearly NOT.
As for the altar boys that has their asses raped by some spinached chin faggot: according to the Mental Retard Movement (MRM), the only important thing is that those boys not be circumcised (the bible instructs that infant boys be circumcised). We all know how bad circumcision is: after all: only the patriarchal religions practice it: Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
Just as the feminazi's were trying to rid the world of those patriarchal religions: so is the Mental Retard Movement (MRM).
By all means: do not take my word for it: Just watch John the Mother Fucker on YouTube, or that dike-looking bitch Girls Writes Twat.
The MRM is fourth wave feminism. All the same goals and ambitions as the previous three waves.
One of those goals is to destroy the patriarchal religions.
I do not know why they even bother: with faggots like the one above running those religions: they are doomed anyway.
It turns out: that David Futrelle actually caught a comment by such a faggot and posted about it on his shit hole of a blog.
In it: he sites an interview with Father Benedict Groeschel:
Referring to Jerry Sandusky as "That poor guy": poor referring to being caught.
He also claims that young boys will often seek a father figure if they did not have one of their own: which leads to kissing and hugging: and eventually it goes to far or something like that.
Can any Mentally Retarded Asswipes call this man any of the following:
Mangina
White Knight
Pussy Beggar
Vagina Worshipper
Alpha Thug
Of course not. Mentally Retarded Asswipes (MRA's) only bash heterosexual men: something that the FAGGOT in the picture above is clearly NOT.
As for the altar boys that has their asses raped by some spinached chin faggot: according to the Mental Retard Movement (MRM), the only important thing is that those boys not be circumcised (the bible instructs that infant boys be circumcised). We all know how bad circumcision is: after all: only the patriarchal religions practice it: Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
Just as the feminazi's were trying to rid the world of those patriarchal religions: so is the Mental Retard Movement (MRM).
By all means: do not take my word for it: Just watch John the Mother Fucker on YouTube, or that dike-looking bitch Girls Writes Twat.
The MRM is fourth wave feminism. All the same goals and ambitions as the previous three waves.
One of those goals is to destroy the patriarchal religions.
I do not know why they even bother: with faggots like the one above running those religions: they are doomed anyway.
Friday, August 3, 2012
Friday, July 8, 2011
The Manipulated Man by Esther Villain
She makes an excellent attempt to manipulate them even further!
Esther Vilar makes excellent points in her book, "The Manipulated Man".
Rather than do a clumsy review of her book: and find flaws with two or three sentences like the manbozo did, I find flaws with at least 5 and perhaps 6 sentences. And instead of being on the side of feminism like manbozo, I am on the side of men.
From The Slaves Happiness
After boring the reader with a purely hypothetical scenario about a man helping a woman change a flat tire, in Esther's warped mind, she claims that such a man would mumble:
"Women! One's more stupid than the next"
Since the scenario is purely hypothetical, it reveals NOTHING about men and women. Such is typical of academics and scholars: they live sheltered lives on college campuses and never get laid: unless they are blowing some fag in a soft sweater to drive their GPA up.
Notice also how derogatory this is to men: Men get pissed off at people they help (i.e. nice guys aren't really nice) this is feminism 101.
It does reveals something about Esther herself: she believes that men look down on women and although they frequently help women: and only women: they secretly hate women: or consider themselves to be superior to women. This does not reveal any man's attitude towards women. It reveals that Esther Vilar has an inferiority complex towards men: as well she should. The average man is smarter and stronger than her: as well as being morally superior to her: as most tend not to be manipulative cunts like Esther.
As she later puts it, "Almost any man would have behaved in the same manner". Bullshit.
Overall, the story holds no merit: I have changed many flat tires in my day: at worst: I spilled beer on my hands while the woman I was with did what I told her to do.
"Women let men work for them, think for them and take on their responsibilities - in fact, they exploit them."
This sentence is very clever indeed. Women let men think for them. I smell feminism at work here: there is no creature on earth that is capable of having another creature "think" for it: to suggest otherwise is in effect an attempt to remove responsibility for their actions.
Notice also that the sentence makes no mention of women's cerebration (their thinking) being used to manipulate men: the very title of the book. Esther Vilar is a fucking retard.
"It is true that men love women, but they also despise them."
Bullshit: well: I do: definitely: this is not true of most men: misogynists are not born: they are made. Yes, that actually came from an MRA (mentally retarded asswipe). Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
"If women really felt oppressed by men, they would have developed hate and fear for them, as the oppressed always do, but women do not fear men, much less hate them. If they really felt humiliated by men's mental superiority, they would have used every means in their power to change the situation. If women really felt unfree, surely, at such a favorable time in their history, they would have broken free of their oppressors."
This is just laughable: women do hate men: it is called an inferiority complex. All the screaming and bitching women have done since the 1960's did not stem from a sense of oppression: it stemmed from an inferiority complex. Esther Vilar is fooling herself (or is she manipulating the men (faggots) who believe this crap). Notice her Freudian slip "felt humiliated by men's mental superiority".
"Whatever men set about to impress women with, counts for nothing in the world of women. Only another woman is of importance in her world."
Good: this is true: it is because women are herd animals: being individuals is irrelevant: being part of the herd is important. Also notice this conflicts with the sentence below (women do not want to please men, but other women).
"Of course woman wants to please man as well: don't let us forget, after all, that he provides the material means."
Wrong: this suggests that women are actually willing to give as well as take: bullshit: women are takers: they never want to give: ever: even if it is something as meaningless and emotionally detached to them as sexual intercourse.
Also, notice that women take extreme satisfaction in every aspect of male suffering: from a man being castrated to being beat by his wife or another man (like the police after she falsely claims that her husband was beating her). Women have no interest in pleasing any man. A lot of women want to inflict pain and misery on a man. Those women that do not: get a thrill from watching those who do. Fucking live with it.
At some point in the book (forgive me, I'd provide you with a chapter, but I have already used the book to wipe my ass), she turns against the Abrahamic religions (specifically Christianity) like a good little feminazi. It never stops killing my wood: how often these "pro-male" bitches have oh so much in common with their feminazi counter-parts.
There are none. The entire book is a pile of steaming cow shit. I feel sorry for people who read it: including myself. I feel even more sorrier for people who take this bimbo's crap seriously: like Mentally Retarded Asswipes taking part in the Mental Retard Movement.
Esthar Vilar, you suck.
I hope you die soon. You are just another fucked up feminazi-cunt-bitch playing acadamia nut-case games with gender relations. Fuck you for writing such a shitty book.
Esther Vilar makes excellent points in her book, "The Manipulated Man".
JUST KIDDING!
Rather than do a clumsy review of her book: and find flaws with two or three sentences like the manbozo did, I find flaws with at least 5 and perhaps 6 sentences. And instead of being on the side of feminism like manbozo, I am on the side of men.
BAD THINGS:
From The Slaves Happiness
After boring the reader with a purely hypothetical scenario about a man helping a woman change a flat tire, in Esther's warped mind, she claims that such a man would mumble:
"Women! One's more stupid than the next"
Since the scenario is purely hypothetical, it reveals NOTHING about men and women. Such is typical of academics and scholars: they live sheltered lives on college campuses and never get laid: unless they are blowing some fag in a soft sweater to drive their GPA up.
Notice also how derogatory this is to men: Men get pissed off at people they help (i.e. nice guys aren't really nice) this is feminism 101.
It does reveals something about Esther herself: she believes that men look down on women and although they frequently help women: and only women: they secretly hate women: or consider themselves to be superior to women. This does not reveal any man's attitude towards women. It reveals that Esther Vilar has an inferiority complex towards men: as well she should. The average man is smarter and stronger than her: as well as being morally superior to her: as most tend not to be manipulative cunts like Esther.
As she later puts it, "Almost any man would have behaved in the same manner". Bullshit.
Overall, the story holds no merit: I have changed many flat tires in my day: at worst: I spilled beer on my hands while the woman I was with did what I told her to do.
"Women let men work for them, think for them and take on their responsibilities - in fact, they exploit them."
This sentence is very clever indeed. Women let men think for them. I smell feminism at work here: there is no creature on earth that is capable of having another creature "think" for it: to suggest otherwise is in effect an attempt to remove responsibility for their actions.
Notice also that the sentence makes no mention of women's cerebration (their thinking) being used to manipulate men: the very title of the book. Esther Vilar is a fucking retard.
"It is true that men love women, but they also despise them."
Bullshit: well: I do: definitely: this is not true of most men: misogynists are not born: they are made. Yes, that actually came from an MRA (mentally retarded asswipe). Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
"If women really felt oppressed by men, they would have developed hate and fear for them, as the oppressed always do, but women do not fear men, much less hate them. If they really felt humiliated by men's mental superiority, they would have used every means in their power to change the situation. If women really felt unfree, surely, at such a favorable time in their history, they would have broken free of their oppressors."
This is just laughable: women do hate men: it is called an inferiority complex. All the screaming and bitching women have done since the 1960's did not stem from a sense of oppression: it stemmed from an inferiority complex. Esther Vilar is fooling herself (or is she manipulating the men (faggots) who believe this crap). Notice her Freudian slip "felt humiliated by men's mental superiority".
"Whatever men set about to impress women with, counts for nothing in the world of women. Only another woman is of importance in her world."
Good: this is true: it is because women are herd animals: being individuals is irrelevant: being part of the herd is important. Also notice this conflicts with the sentence below (women do not want to please men, but other women).
"Of course woman wants to please man as well: don't let us forget, after all, that he provides the material means."
Wrong: this suggests that women are actually willing to give as well as take: bullshit: women are takers: they never want to give: ever: even if it is something as meaningless and emotionally detached to them as sexual intercourse.
Also, notice that women take extreme satisfaction in every aspect of male suffering: from a man being castrated to being beat by his wife or another man (like the police after she falsely claims that her husband was beating her). Women have no interest in pleasing any man. A lot of women want to inflict pain and misery on a man. Those women that do not: get a thrill from watching those who do. Fucking live with it.
At some point in the book (forgive me, I'd provide you with a chapter, but I have already used the book to wipe my ass), she turns against the Abrahamic religions (specifically Christianity) like a good little feminazi. It never stops killing my wood: how often these "pro-male" bitches have oh so much in common with their feminazi counter-parts.
GOOD POINTS:
There are none. The entire book is a pile of steaming cow shit. I feel sorry for people who read it: including myself. I feel even more sorrier for people who take this bimbo's crap seriously: like Mentally Retarded Asswipes taking part in the Mental Retard Movement.
Esthar Vilar, you suck.
I hope you die soon. You are just another fucked up feminazi-cunt-bitch playing acadamia nut-case games with gender relations. Fuck you for writing such a shitty book.
I hope you rot in hell bitch.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)