Monday, March 24, 2014
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
MRA's ARE Feminists
There is no difference: and it is becoming more and more clear.
The reason that feminism is so prolific: is that: the people fighting are doing nothing of the sort: they are in fact enforcing it even more.
I stumbled on this at mantits place:
The little kid from Sex Trek the next Penetration: Wil Wheaton said this about the faggot MRA's:
The Men’s Rights crowd are the biggest bunch of idiots I have ever accidentally noticed in my life.
Amen brother Wheaton: Amen.
One MRA's response: from the picture above:
Wil Wheaton has never had to live life as a regular man. He has never been treated by women as a regular man. He IS a privileged white male. All those things that feminists say that white men have that we recognize are actually really only reserved for RICH white men? Well. He's a rich white male. So. What do you expect? Perspective? LOL. He has media to sell and pussy to pander to for approval, hanglowstankin, and profit.
When feminists were rejected by women: or by men: their response would be no different.
You don't understand because you are privileged.
The ass clown also bashes him: assuming he is straight: is he straight: or is he gay?
This is typical white heterosexual male hatred at work.
It is coming from the MRM: not feminism.
The reason that feminism is so prolific: is that: the people fighting are doing nothing of the sort: they are in fact enforcing it even more.
I stumbled on this at mantits place:
The Men’s Rights crowd are the biggest bunch of idiots I have ever accidentally noticed in my life.
Amen brother Wheaton: Amen.
One MRA's response: from the picture above:
Wil Wheaton has never had to live life as a regular man. He has never been treated by women as a regular man. He IS a privileged white male. All those things that feminists say that white men have that we recognize are actually really only reserved for RICH white men? Well. He's a rich white male. So. What do you expect? Perspective? LOL. He has media to sell and pussy to pander to for approval, hanglowstankin, and profit.
When feminists were rejected by women: or by men: their response would be no different.
You don't understand because you are privileged.
The ass clown also bashes him: assuming he is straight: is he straight: or is he gay?
This is typical white heterosexual male hatred at work.
It is coming from the MRM: not feminism.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
How to Talk Like a Complete FAG
Instead of calling yourself a dude: man: or guy: refer to yourself as an MRA/MHRA/MGTOW/INCEL/FAG.
Whenever you see men not acting like prissy stuck up woman hating faggots: call them names like “White Knight” or “Mangina”.
If you see a man coming onto a woman: call him a “pussy beggar”.
If you encounter a man that is straight and enjoys sex: call him a “vagina worshipper”.
Instead of claiming that women have become filled with venomous male hatred: claim that women raping men is in fact: a serious societal crisis.
Claim you support men’s rights: like a retard: then claim you want to see other men who disagree with your opinions get ass raped in prisons.
Rehash feminist ideals while claiming to be opposing them.
When some teenager gets lucky with his hot female teacher: scream bloody murder: sex is dirty!
Watch or read Paul Elam’s feminist bullshit.
Thumb up every video that Something That Looks Kind of Like a Girl Writes What videos on YouTube: even though all she is doing is tiredly rehashing what many men have already said. After all: she is a woman: so it is somehow more valid when she it says it.
Talk endlessly about hunter gatherer societies and other bullshit you read about in books written by fuzzy sweater academics who never actually saw or experienced such societies.
Mention wooly mammoths frequently: and how they give you a boner.
Yes: you too can talk like a total FAGGOT.
Practice, practice, practice.
In no time: you’ll be a prissy heterosex-hating fag and a proud member of theman-o-sphere fag-o-sphere.
Whenever you see men not acting like prissy stuck up woman hating faggots: call them names like “White Knight” or “Mangina”.
If you see a man coming onto a woman: call him a “pussy beggar”.
If you encounter a man that is straight and enjoys sex: call him a “vagina worshipper”.
Instead of claiming that women have become filled with venomous male hatred: claim that women raping men is in fact: a serious societal crisis.
Claim you support men’s rights: like a retard: then claim you want to see other men who disagree with your opinions get ass raped in prisons.
Rehash feminist ideals while claiming to be opposing them.
When some teenager gets lucky with his hot female teacher: scream bloody murder: sex is dirty!
Watch or read Paul Elam’s feminist bullshit.
Thumb up every video that Something That Looks Kind of Like a Girl Writes What videos on YouTube: even though all she is doing is tiredly rehashing what many men have already said. After all: she is a woman: so it is somehow more valid when she it says it.
Talk endlessly about hunter gatherer societies and other bullshit you read about in books written by fuzzy sweater academics who never actually saw or experienced such societies.
Mention wooly mammoths frequently: and how they give you a boner.
Yes: you too can talk like a total FAGGOT.
Practice, practice, practice.
In no time: you’ll be a prissy heterosex-hating fag and a proud member of the
Friday, May 10, 2013
What is a Humanist?
Here is the definition straight from Wikipedia:
"Humanism is a group of philosophies and ethical perspectives which emphasize the value and agency of human beings, individually, and collectively, and generally prefers individual thought and evidence (rationalism, empiricism) over established doctrine or faith (fideism)."
So: the MRM: or at least parts of it: are now calling themselves MHRM or some shit like that.
This is no surprise: they have simply come out of the closet with their battlecry: "Mine is the absolute right"
As any idiot knows: science is always right about everything: it is not like it is a bunch of eggheads making wild guesses at how things work: or how things were: no sir!
Science is always correct: Science says there is no God: if you believe in God: you are flawed: you are not a "Humanist": and therefore do not support "humans": you evil bad nasty person you (didn't the feminazis say this at one point?)
There is so much wrong with this: I cannot even begin.
The current established doctrine is not "faith": the current established INdoctrine is political correctness.
Most faiths and their moral values guarantee that humans will be valued.
I have said this before: I will say it again: just as the feminist sought to destroy organized religion: the MRMs are now going to have a go at it too.
The MRM or MHRM is 4th wave feminism.
"Humanism is a group of philosophies and ethical perspectives which emphasize the value and agency of human beings, individually, and collectively, and generally prefers individual thought and evidence (rationalism, empiricism) over established doctrine or faith (fideism)."
So: the MRM: or at least parts of it: are now calling themselves MHRM or some shit like that.
This is no surprise: they have simply come out of the closet with their battlecry: "Mine is the absolute right"
As any idiot knows: science is always right about everything: it is not like it is a bunch of eggheads making wild guesses at how things work: or how things were: no sir!
Science is always correct: Science says there is no God: if you believe in God: you are flawed: you are not a "Humanist": and therefore do not support "humans": you evil bad nasty person you (didn't the feminazis say this at one point?)
There is so much wrong with this: I cannot even begin.
The current established doctrine is not "faith": the current established INdoctrine is political correctness.
Most faiths and their moral values guarantee that humans will be valued.
I have said this before: I will say it again: just as the feminist sought to destroy organized religion: the MRMs are now going to have a go at it too.
The MRM or MHRM is 4th wave feminism.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Watch the Video that MRAs Don't Want you to REALLY Pay Attention To
What MRAs do NOT want you to notice: is that she is claiming that feminisms goals and the MRMs goals are the same.
MRAs would have you believe that they are drowning her out because she is a feminist: and they are being truthful about that: her words are very dangerous to them: especially if you hear them and compare them to what MRAs often say
What they do not want you to hear: is her criteria for a social movement: it is in fact nearly identical to what the MRMs criteria is.
Do not believe me: watch it and soak in her words: then go read some MRA blogs
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Darth Elam now Threatening to Give Men Blow Jobs
That fucking wacky ass Darth Elam has hit a new low.
To quote: "Most men are one blowjob away from becoming feminists".
What Darth Fucktard Elam does not understand is that no matter how many blowjobs he gives other men: most of them will not become feminists.
Somebody should really straighten him out.
I did read one article called: "Tits, Ass and Fucktards" or something like that.
At first: I thought it was going to be an honest criticism of members of A Voicy Fucktarded Man's website.
I was disappointed.
Perhaps I'll write my own article criticising the MRM.
I'll call it: "Boobs, Asses and Fucktards"
To quote: "Most men are one blowjob away from becoming feminists".
What Darth Fucktard Elam does not understand is that no matter how many blowjobs he gives other men: most of them will not become feminists.
Somebody should really straighten him out.
I did read one article called: "Tits, Ass and Fucktards" or something like that.
At first: I thought it was going to be an honest criticism of members of A Voicy Fucktarded Man's website.
I was disappointed.
Perhaps I'll write my own article criticising the MRM.
I'll call it: "Boobs, Asses and Fucktards"
Saturday, February 9, 2013
The MRM (Mental Retard Movement) and "Traditionalism"
Traditionalism does not exist.
It exists only in the minds of those who speak of it: and takes the form of whatever academic (i.e. non-realistic, hypothetical, sponge-headed, reclusive and isolated) stance the writer or speaker wishes.
I offer an example for your mind: Feminists believed that "Traditionalism" was women being hand-cuffed to stoves: not being allowed to have jobs: not being allowed to vote: not being allowed to own land.
All of those are false.
Notice now: that the "head cheeses" in the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) have defined "traditionalism" using their own empty-headed philosophies.
To them: it is near kindred to what the feminists thought: only it casts men into the role of perpetual victim instead of women.
Yes: there can be no denying this: the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) hates "traditionalism".
OK: you are right: and I am wrong: the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) does not hate "traditionalism": just as feminists do not hate rape. The dark fact is: they love it.
Without "traditionalism": the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) would have no excuse to bash right wing politics: just like the feminazi's did. The feminazi's love rape: because without it: they cannot bash men and cast themselves as victims: they love domestic violence for the same reasons.
I'll give these morons credit where credit is due: they get to kill two birds with one stone: they suggest that "traditionalism" was bad for men: and that only "right-wing" people: or conservatives: actually uphold it.
BULLSHIT.
Men and Women on both sides of the political spectrum support "traditionalism". This is because there is no such thing. "Traditionalism" takes whatever form the speaker or writer wishes it to take.
Therefore: a feminist will hate "traditionalism" because they believe it meant women being chained to stoves while somebody who has a more "romanticized" cerebration of it will be a rabid supporter of it.
A Mentally Retarded Asswipe will hate "traditionalism" because they have read essay after essay in the "man-o-sphere" claiming it is a bad thing: and only "conservatives" (i.e. right-wing people: republicans) actually support it.
So: we see a repeated theme in the Mental Retard Movement:
"Traditionalism" is bad.
Conservatives are bad for supporting it.
Feminists were EXACTLY the same way: they hated "conservatism" because of "traditionalism". Their definition of traditionalism was based on their own HER-story revisions of it. We now see the same thing happening in the MRM: a hatred of "conservatism" or right-wing politics (i.e. republicans) because of "traditionalism": something that is ill defined in 500+ word essays I'd like to wipe my ass with.
The whole thesis of my blog: the MRM is 4th wave feminism.
Every essay that appears in the man-o-sphere re-enforces this: Fidelbogus, Darth Elam, and many other "head cheeses" have all bashed traditionalism and right-wing politics. This is exactly what the feminists did.
I am glad I am not into taking "red pills": otherwise: I'd be running around: pretending to be against feminism: while my every word and action would simply reinforce the fact that I was a feminist.
I offer this link to a book written by two authors from the MuffingtonBoast.
My message to anybody calling themself an MRA:
Try thinking for yourself: instead of letting pill-popping morons do it for you.
ALSO: it is my understanding that over at the Death Star (avfm), many of the writers are now admitted lesbians who were sexually traumatized at a young age (something that looks like a girl writes squat, and typhon blue: just to name two).
You idiots in the MRM need to wake up and realize what has happened to you: you are now supporters of feminism: and you are being led by the same queer bitches that led feminism.
IDIOTS!
It exists only in the minds of those who speak of it: and takes the form of whatever academic (i.e. non-realistic, hypothetical, sponge-headed, reclusive and isolated) stance the writer or speaker wishes.
I offer an example for your mind: Feminists believed that "Traditionalism" was women being hand-cuffed to stoves: not being allowed to have jobs: not being allowed to vote: not being allowed to own land.
All of those are false.
Notice now: that the "head cheeses" in the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) have defined "traditionalism" using their own empty-headed philosophies.
To them: it is near kindred to what the feminists thought: only it casts men into the role of perpetual victim instead of women.
Yes: there can be no denying this: the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) hates "traditionalism".
OK: you are right: and I am wrong: the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) does not hate "traditionalism": just as feminists do not hate rape. The dark fact is: they love it.
Without "traditionalism": the MRM (Mental Retard Movement) would have no excuse to bash right wing politics: just like the feminazi's did. The feminazi's love rape: because without it: they cannot bash men and cast themselves as victims: they love domestic violence for the same reasons.
I'll give these morons credit where credit is due: they get to kill two birds with one stone: they suggest that "traditionalism" was bad for men: and that only "right-wing" people: or conservatives: actually uphold it.
BULLSHIT.
Men and Women on both sides of the political spectrum support "traditionalism". This is because there is no such thing. "Traditionalism" takes whatever form the speaker or writer wishes it to take.
Therefore: a feminist will hate "traditionalism" because they believe it meant women being chained to stoves while somebody who has a more "romanticized" cerebration of it will be a rabid supporter of it.
A Mentally Retarded Asswipe will hate "traditionalism" because they have read essay after essay in the "man-o-sphere" claiming it is a bad thing: and only "conservatives" (i.e. right-wing people: republicans) actually support it.
So: we see a repeated theme in the Mental Retard Movement:
"Traditionalism" is bad.
Conservatives are bad for supporting it.
Feminists were EXACTLY the same way: they hated "conservatism" because of "traditionalism". Their definition of traditionalism was based on their own HER-story revisions of it. We now see the same thing happening in the MRM: a hatred of "conservatism" or right-wing politics (i.e. republicans) because of "traditionalism": something that is ill defined in 500+ word essays I'd like to wipe my ass with.
The whole thesis of my blog: the MRM is 4th wave feminism.
Every essay that appears in the man-o-sphere re-enforces this: Fidelbogus, Darth Elam, and many other "head cheeses" have all bashed traditionalism and right-wing politics. This is exactly what the feminists did.
I am glad I am not into taking "red pills": otherwise: I'd be running around: pretending to be against feminism: while my every word and action would simply reinforce the fact that I was a feminist.
I offer this link to a book written by two authors from the MuffingtonBoast.
My message to anybody calling themself an MRA:
Try thinking for yourself: instead of letting pill-popping morons do it for you.
ALSO: it is my understanding that over at the Death Star (avfm), many of the writers are now admitted lesbians who were sexually traumatized at a young age (something that looks like a girl writes squat, and typhon blue: just to name two).
You idiots in the MRM need to wake up and realize what has happened to you: you are now supporters of feminism: and you are being led by the same queer bitches that led feminism.
IDIOTS!
Sunday, February 3, 2013
More Feminist Bullshit
It has been brought to my attention: that more and more key players in the MRM hoax are simply rehashing feminist ideals and philosophies.
excessive praise of left wing politics.
antagonizing of right wing politics.
excessive praise of gay men.
antagonizing straight men.
antagonizing patriarchal religions.
excessive praise of atheism.
hatred of traditionalism: more specifically: to bash right wing politics or religion: funny isn't it: how people who were not alive many years ago know exactly what life was like so many years ago.
I am gathering clips and essays: the list is overwhelming.
Any MRA reading this will probably say to their self: gee, he is lying: he is making this up: or worse: they will openly admit that feminists (man-haters) were correct about many things.
To those who doubt I say this: open wide: I am going to shove a truck load of feminism and MRAism right down your throat in the near future: and you will not notice a difference in the flavor.
To those who support feminism: which most MRAs do: they just do not realize it: because they equate traditionalism with feminism: you are no friend of men: you are a friend of male hatred.
excessive praise of left wing politics.
antagonizing of right wing politics.
excessive praise of gay men.
antagonizing straight men.
antagonizing patriarchal religions.
excessive praise of atheism.
hatred of traditionalism: more specifically: to bash right wing politics or religion: funny isn't it: how people who were not alive many years ago know exactly what life was like so many years ago.
I am gathering clips and essays: the list is overwhelming.
Any MRA reading this will probably say to their self: gee, he is lying: he is making this up: or worse: they will openly admit that feminists (man-haters) were correct about many things.
To those who doubt I say this: open wide: I am going to shove a truck load of feminism and MRAism right down your throat in the near future: and you will not notice a difference in the flavor.
To those who support feminism: which most MRAs do: they just do not realize it: because they equate traditionalism with feminism: you are no friend of men: you are a friend of male hatred.
Friday, January 4, 2013
The Next Logical Step
Feminism is poisoning Atheism
LMFAO!!!
Yeah: and fascism poisoned the Nazi party.
These left wing apologists and atheist apologists get funnier and funnier by the minute.
Let's see here: what else can I come up with to match Darth Elam's rapier wit:
Racism is poisoning the KKK.
Sexism is poisoning the feminists.
Idiots are poisoning the MRM (which is all in my head).
Lard is poisoning David Futrelle.
Poison is poisoning rat poison.
Who put poison in my poison?
LMFAO!!!
WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!
I do not know who to feel sorry for: the fuckwits who call themselves MRA's: or the feminists.
How about neither: they are all human trash.
God damn: I never laughed so hard in my life!!!
LMFAO!!!
Yeah: and fascism poisoned the Nazi party.
These left wing apologists and atheist apologists get funnier and funnier by the minute.
Let's see here: what else can I come up with to match Darth Elam's rapier wit:
Racism is poisoning the KKK.
Sexism is poisoning the feminists.
Idiots are poisoning the MRM (which is all in my head).
Lard is poisoning David Futrelle.
Poison is poisoning rat poison.
Who put poison in my poison?
LMFAO!!!
WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!
I do not know who to feel sorry for: the fuckwits who call themselves MRA's: or the feminists.
How about neither: they are all human trash.
God damn: I never laughed so hard in my life!!!
Monday, October 15, 2012
MRAs and the MRM: its all in my mind!
Fidelbogen is one of the wackiest craziest guys I know! Here is twat he wrote about me: appropriately written in sweet-pink:
notanmra: Your obsession with "MRA" and "MRM" is totally misplaced.
These things are fictional constructs of your mind, and nothing more.
You are very much like a feminist in that way.
So: all those blogs and people writing mindless rehashings of feminazi tripe: WHO CLEARLY CALL THEMSELVES THESE THINGS: are all my imagination.
I tell you: I never laughed so hard in my life. I was drinking my morning gin getting ready to count beans: and I spit it out all over the company computer.
And oh yeah: I am the one who is like the feminists.
Well fidelbogen sir: this blog is going to dedicate itself to digging up old feminist essays: you will see just how wrong you are. It is the MRAs and the MRM that are like the feminists: I suspect you already know this though: and are scared of what I am going to reveal.
Did you know that Andrea Dworkin's admittedly FAGGOT husband wrote about how "men think with their dicks"?
And: so did Darth Elam.
Read the shit at the top of this blog: the MRM exists: it is fourth wave feminism.
Fidelbogen: I gotta love you: you are one crazy bastard!
notanmra: Your obsession with "MRA" and "MRM" is totally misplaced.
These things are fictional constructs of your mind, and nothing more.
You are very much like a feminist in that way.
So: all those blogs and people writing mindless rehashings of feminazi tripe: WHO CLEARLY CALL THEMSELVES THESE THINGS: are all my imagination.
I tell you: I never laughed so hard in my life. I was drinking my morning gin getting ready to count beans: and I spit it out all over the company computer.
Fidelbogen: one wild and crazy guy!
Well fidelbogen sir: this blog is going to dedicate itself to digging up old feminist essays: you will see just how wrong you are. It is the MRAs and the MRM that are like the feminists: I suspect you already know this though: and are scared of what I am going to reveal.
Did you know that Andrea Dworkin's admittedly FAGGOT husband wrote about how "men think with their dicks"?
And: so did Darth Elam.
Read the shit at the top of this blog: the MRM exists: it is fourth wave feminism.
Fidelbogen: I gotta love you: you are one crazy bastard!
Friday, September 7, 2012
Spot on Again...
"This is why the so-called Men’s Rights movement is not so much a rights movement as a take-away-other-people’s-rights movement."
Words more true were never typed.
That came from David Futrelle. I would trust him to be in charge of men and their rights before I'd trust any Mentally Retarded Asswipe.
Don't believe me?
Check out this video from John the Other: a well known butt-buddy of Darth Elam. Yes: John the Mother is fighting for your right to NOT be religious:
ACTUALLY THAT IS WRONG.
He is fighting against the Christian religion: just like the feminists from days of old did.
Attention to my 3 serious followers: I am digging up old feminist essays: and I will be comparing them to modern day Mentally Retarded Asswipe essays. You will find that the similarities are shocking: especially since none of you have brains.
Words more true were never typed.
That came from David Futrelle. I would trust him to be in charge of men and their rights before I'd trust any Mentally Retarded Asswipe.
Don't believe me?
Check out this video from John the Other: a well known butt-buddy of Darth Elam. Yes: John the Mother is fighting for your right to NOT be religious:
ACTUALLY THAT IS WRONG.
He is fighting against the Christian religion: just like the feminists from days of old did.
Attention to my 3 serious followers: I am digging up old feminist essays: and I will be comparing them to modern day Mentally Retarded Asswipe essays. You will find that the similarities are shocking: especially since none of you have brains.
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Manboobz: More in the Corner of Boys than Mentally Retarded Asswipes (MRA's)
Any spinached chin old fart that suggests that 14 year old boys are somehow capable of seducing them is with no doubt: a complete faggot.
It turns out: that David Futrelle actually caught a comment by such a faggot and posted about it on his shit hole of a blog.
In it: he sites an interview with Father Benedict Groeschel:
Father Benedict Groeschel actually said some very inflammatory things. Some examples include:
Referring to Jerry Sandusky as "That poor guy": poor referring to being caught.
He also claims that young boys will often seek a father figure if they did not have one of their own: which leads to kissing and hugging: and eventually it goes to far or something like that.
Can any Mentally Retarded Asswipes call this man any of the following:
Of course not. Mentally Retarded Asswipes (MRA's) only bash heterosexual men: something that the FAGGOT in the picture above is clearly NOT.
As for the altar boys that has their asses raped by some spinached chin faggot: according to the Mental Retard Movement (MRM), the only important thing is that those boys not be circumcised (the bible instructs that infant boys be circumcised). We all know how bad circumcision is: after all: only the patriarchal religions practice it: Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
Just as the feminazi's were trying to rid the world of those patriarchal religions: so is the Mental Retard Movement (MRM).
By all means: do not take my word for it: Just watch John the Mother Fucker on YouTube, or that dike-looking bitch Girls Writes Twat.
The MRM is fourth wave feminism. All the same goals and ambitions as the previous three waves.
One of those goals is to destroy the patriarchal religions.
I do not know why they even bother: with faggots like the one above running those religions: they are doomed anyway.
It turns out: that David Futrelle actually caught a comment by such a faggot and posted about it on his shit hole of a blog.
In it: he sites an interview with Father Benedict Groeschel:
Referring to Jerry Sandusky as "That poor guy": poor referring to being caught.
He also claims that young boys will often seek a father figure if they did not have one of their own: which leads to kissing and hugging: and eventually it goes to far or something like that.
Can any Mentally Retarded Asswipes call this man any of the following:
Mangina
White Knight
Pussy Beggar
Vagina Worshipper
Alpha Thug
Of course not. Mentally Retarded Asswipes (MRA's) only bash heterosexual men: something that the FAGGOT in the picture above is clearly NOT.
As for the altar boys that has their asses raped by some spinached chin faggot: according to the Mental Retard Movement (MRM), the only important thing is that those boys not be circumcised (the bible instructs that infant boys be circumcised). We all know how bad circumcision is: after all: only the patriarchal religions practice it: Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
Just as the feminazi's were trying to rid the world of those patriarchal religions: so is the Mental Retard Movement (MRM).
By all means: do not take my word for it: Just watch John the Mother Fucker on YouTube, or that dike-looking bitch Girls Writes Twat.
The MRM is fourth wave feminism. All the same goals and ambitions as the previous three waves.
One of those goals is to destroy the patriarchal religions.
I do not know why they even bother: with faggots like the one above running those religions: they are doomed anyway.
Friday, August 3, 2012
Friday, July 8, 2011
The Manipulated Man by Esther Villain
She makes an excellent attempt to manipulate them even further!
Esther Vilar makes excellent points in her book, "The Manipulated Man".
Rather than do a clumsy review of her book: and find flaws with two or three sentences like the manbozo did, I find flaws with at least 5 and perhaps 6 sentences. And instead of being on the side of feminism like manbozo, I am on the side of men.
From The Slaves Happiness
After boring the reader with a purely hypothetical scenario about a man helping a woman change a flat tire, in Esther's warped mind, she claims that such a man would mumble:
"Women! One's more stupid than the next"
Since the scenario is purely hypothetical, it reveals NOTHING about men and women. Such is typical of academics and scholars: they live sheltered lives on college campuses and never get laid: unless they are blowing some fag in a soft sweater to drive their GPA up.
Notice also how derogatory this is to men: Men get pissed off at people they help (i.e. nice guys aren't really nice) this is feminism 101.
It does reveals something about Esther herself: she believes that men look down on women and although they frequently help women: and only women: they secretly hate women: or consider themselves to be superior to women. This does not reveal any man's attitude towards women. It reveals that Esther Vilar has an inferiority complex towards men: as well she should. The average man is smarter and stronger than her: as well as being morally superior to her: as most tend not to be manipulative cunts like Esther.
As she later puts it, "Almost any man would have behaved in the same manner". Bullshit.
Overall, the story holds no merit: I have changed many flat tires in my day: at worst: I spilled beer on my hands while the woman I was with did what I told her to do.
"Women let men work for them, think for them and take on their responsibilities - in fact, they exploit them."
This sentence is very clever indeed. Women let men think for them. I smell feminism at work here: there is no creature on earth that is capable of having another creature "think" for it: to suggest otherwise is in effect an attempt to remove responsibility for their actions.
Notice also that the sentence makes no mention of women's cerebration (their thinking) being used to manipulate men: the very title of the book. Esther Vilar is a fucking retard.
"It is true that men love women, but they also despise them."
Bullshit: well: I do: definitely: this is not true of most men: misogynists are not born: they are made. Yes, that actually came from an MRA (mentally retarded asswipe). Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
"If women really felt oppressed by men, they would have developed hate and fear for them, as the oppressed always do, but women do not fear men, much less hate them. If they really felt humiliated by men's mental superiority, they would have used every means in their power to change the situation. If women really felt unfree, surely, at such a favorable time in their history, they would have broken free of their oppressors."
This is just laughable: women do hate men: it is called an inferiority complex. All the screaming and bitching women have done since the 1960's did not stem from a sense of oppression: it stemmed from an inferiority complex. Esther Vilar is fooling herself (or is she manipulating the men (faggots) who believe this crap). Notice her Freudian slip "felt humiliated by men's mental superiority".
"Whatever men set about to impress women with, counts for nothing in the world of women. Only another woman is of importance in her world."
Good: this is true: it is because women are herd animals: being individuals is irrelevant: being part of the herd is important. Also notice this conflicts with the sentence below (women do not want to please men, but other women).
"Of course woman wants to please man as well: don't let us forget, after all, that he provides the material means."
Wrong: this suggests that women are actually willing to give as well as take: bullshit: women are takers: they never want to give: ever: even if it is something as meaningless and emotionally detached to them as sexual intercourse.
Also, notice that women take extreme satisfaction in every aspect of male suffering: from a man being castrated to being beat by his wife or another man (like the police after she falsely claims that her husband was beating her). Women have no interest in pleasing any man. A lot of women want to inflict pain and misery on a man. Those women that do not: get a thrill from watching those who do. Fucking live with it.
At some point in the book (forgive me, I'd provide you with a chapter, but I have already used the book to wipe my ass), she turns against the Abrahamic religions (specifically Christianity) like a good little feminazi. It never stops killing my wood: how often these "pro-male" bitches have oh so much in common with their feminazi counter-parts.
There are none. The entire book is a pile of steaming cow shit. I feel sorry for people who read it: including myself. I feel even more sorrier for people who take this bimbo's crap seriously: like Mentally Retarded Asswipes taking part in the Mental Retard Movement.
Esthar Vilar, you suck.
I hope you die soon. You are just another fucked up feminazi-cunt-bitch playing acadamia nut-case games with gender relations. Fuck you for writing such a shitty book.
Esther Vilar makes excellent points in her book, "The Manipulated Man".
JUST KIDDING!
Rather than do a clumsy review of her book: and find flaws with two or three sentences like the manbozo did, I find flaws with at least 5 and perhaps 6 sentences. And instead of being on the side of feminism like manbozo, I am on the side of men.
BAD THINGS:
From The Slaves Happiness
After boring the reader with a purely hypothetical scenario about a man helping a woman change a flat tire, in Esther's warped mind, she claims that such a man would mumble:
"Women! One's more stupid than the next"
Since the scenario is purely hypothetical, it reveals NOTHING about men and women. Such is typical of academics and scholars: they live sheltered lives on college campuses and never get laid: unless they are blowing some fag in a soft sweater to drive their GPA up.
Notice also how derogatory this is to men: Men get pissed off at people they help (i.e. nice guys aren't really nice) this is feminism 101.
It does reveals something about Esther herself: she believes that men look down on women and although they frequently help women: and only women: they secretly hate women: or consider themselves to be superior to women. This does not reveal any man's attitude towards women. It reveals that Esther Vilar has an inferiority complex towards men: as well she should. The average man is smarter and stronger than her: as well as being morally superior to her: as most tend not to be manipulative cunts like Esther.
As she later puts it, "Almost any man would have behaved in the same manner". Bullshit.
Overall, the story holds no merit: I have changed many flat tires in my day: at worst: I spilled beer on my hands while the woman I was with did what I told her to do.
"Women let men work for them, think for them and take on their responsibilities - in fact, they exploit them."
This sentence is very clever indeed. Women let men think for them. I smell feminism at work here: there is no creature on earth that is capable of having another creature "think" for it: to suggest otherwise is in effect an attempt to remove responsibility for their actions.
Notice also that the sentence makes no mention of women's cerebration (their thinking) being used to manipulate men: the very title of the book. Esther Vilar is a fucking retard.
"It is true that men love women, but they also despise them."
Bullshit: well: I do: definitely: this is not true of most men: misogynists are not born: they are made. Yes, that actually came from an MRA (mentally retarded asswipe). Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
"If women really felt oppressed by men, they would have developed hate and fear for them, as the oppressed always do, but women do not fear men, much less hate them. If they really felt humiliated by men's mental superiority, they would have used every means in their power to change the situation. If women really felt unfree, surely, at such a favorable time in their history, they would have broken free of their oppressors."
This is just laughable: women do hate men: it is called an inferiority complex. All the screaming and bitching women have done since the 1960's did not stem from a sense of oppression: it stemmed from an inferiority complex. Esther Vilar is fooling herself (or is she manipulating the men (faggots) who believe this crap). Notice her Freudian slip "felt humiliated by men's mental superiority".
"Whatever men set about to impress women with, counts for nothing in the world of women. Only another woman is of importance in her world."
Good: this is true: it is because women are herd animals: being individuals is irrelevant: being part of the herd is important. Also notice this conflicts with the sentence below (women do not want to please men, but other women).
"Of course woman wants to please man as well: don't let us forget, after all, that he provides the material means."
Wrong: this suggests that women are actually willing to give as well as take: bullshit: women are takers: they never want to give: ever: even if it is something as meaningless and emotionally detached to them as sexual intercourse.
Also, notice that women take extreme satisfaction in every aspect of male suffering: from a man being castrated to being beat by his wife or another man (like the police after she falsely claims that her husband was beating her). Women have no interest in pleasing any man. A lot of women want to inflict pain and misery on a man. Those women that do not: get a thrill from watching those who do. Fucking live with it.
At some point in the book (forgive me, I'd provide you with a chapter, but I have already used the book to wipe my ass), she turns against the Abrahamic religions (specifically Christianity) like a good little feminazi. It never stops killing my wood: how often these "pro-male" bitches have oh so much in common with their feminazi counter-parts.
GOOD POINTS:
There are none. The entire book is a pile of steaming cow shit. I feel sorry for people who read it: including myself. I feel even more sorrier for people who take this bimbo's crap seriously: like Mentally Retarded Asswipes taking part in the Mental Retard Movement.
Esthar Vilar, you suck.
I hope you die soon. You are just another fucked up feminazi-cunt-bitch playing acadamia nut-case games with gender relations. Fuck you for writing such a shitty book.
I hope you rot in hell bitch.
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
An Excellent Example of how to "Invalidate Oneself"
This guy made a video from his parent's basement on YouTube that I watched:
He makes some of the most noteworthy points I have ever seen in it: some may be hokey: but the points are made nonetheless (please take note, I watched the video a while back, and it was removed then re-posted: the times might be different).
@8:20: I never take a woman's violence seriously: usually I cannot keep a straight face.
Fundamental flaw in the video that I spotted (forgive me Mentally Retarded Asswipe dudes for providing an objective analysis):
The woman was actually saying: "Ow that hurts" when people interacted.
The man being hit never complained about being in any discomfort.
I wonder: what if the man being hit had cried out for help, or complained about how much discomfort he was in? Would people have helped him? I would have.
And, in all fairness to the Mentally Metarded Asswipe that made the video: @9:20: The woman who approaches the couple says: "everyone wants to call the cops on you guys": she does not tell the abusive women: "everybody wants to call the cops on you LADY". She then offers to help the woman doing the abusing: she makes no complaint about the woman's violent behavior.
the ignored gender of course make no mention of this either...
@11:30: the woman interviewed who watched the woman hitting the man says: "They should not be hitting one another". Even though the man never hit the women. She then continues saying: "I was concerned for both of their safety". Bullsh*t lady.
What can we learn from this video: f***ing nothing. I just wasted 13 minutes of my life: and if you followed it along: so did you dumbf***.
However: the ignored gender is a Mentally Retarded Asswipe of sorts. Watch him invalidate himself with another video he made from his parent's basement:
That is a video all about holding doors open: yesiree: it is no wonder there is so much male hatred and so many biased laws today: there are many a white knight and mangina that hold doors open for women: oh those filthy filthy bastards.
He is a petty screwball fixated on holding doors open rather than valid issues.
It is no wonder people ignore him!
He makes some of the most noteworthy points I have ever seen in it: some may be hokey: but the points are made nonetheless (please take note, I watched the video a while back, and it was removed then re-posted: the times might be different).
@8:20: I never take a woman's violence seriously: usually I cannot keep a straight face.
Fundamental flaw in the video that I spotted (forgive me Mentally Retarded Asswipe dudes for providing an objective analysis):
The woman was actually saying: "Ow that hurts" when people interacted.
The man being hit never complained about being in any discomfort.
I wonder: what if the man being hit had cried out for help, or complained about how much discomfort he was in? Would people have helped him? I would have.
And, in all fairness to the Mentally Metarded Asswipe that made the video: @9:20: The woman who approaches the couple says: "everyone wants to call the cops on you guys": she does not tell the abusive women: "everybody wants to call the cops on you LADY". She then offers to help the woman doing the abusing: she makes no complaint about the woman's violent behavior.
the ignored gender of course make no mention of this either...
@11:30: the woman interviewed who watched the woman hitting the man says: "They should not be hitting one another". Even though the man never hit the women. She then continues saying: "I was concerned for both of their safety". Bullsh*t lady.
What can we learn from this video: f***ing nothing. I just wasted 13 minutes of my life: and if you followed it along: so did you dumbf***.
However: the ignored gender is a Mentally Retarded Asswipe of sorts. Watch him invalidate himself with another video he made from his parent's basement:
That is a video all about holding doors open: yesiree: it is no wonder there is so much male hatred and so many biased laws today: there are many a white knight and mangina that hold doors open for women: oh those filthy filthy bastards.
He is a petty screwball fixated on holding doors open rather than valid issues.
It is no wonder people ignore him!
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
MRAs: Take your Red Pills, and your Blue Pills, and Shove 'Em up your Arse
One re-occuring theme among Mentally Retarded Asswipes (MRAs) and the Mental Retard Movement (MRM) and other queers (MGTOWs) is the she-bang about red pills and blue pills.
I like The Matrix as much as the next guy: except for that militant vegan looking lesbian character. I liked the second one better: except for that militant vegan looking lesbian, and I enjoyed the third one as well: except for that militant vegan looking lesbian.
One question I keep asking myself: Why the red-pill analogy? At first glance, the "social engineers" behind the Mental Retard Movement (MRM) would have us believe that we are all in some kind of a trance: and that we need to wake up to reality: reality being how much male-hatred exists in the legal system and whatnot.
This is a lie.
We need to wake up to how much male hatred exists as much as we need to: wake up and realize that the sky is blue: wake up and realize that the Earth revolves around the sun: wake up and realize there is no such thing as the Easter Bunny.
The reason the "red pill" analogy is used is to place the allusion that people who are against said inequalities against men are a bunch of shut-in science fiction nerds who are detached from reality. In other words, people who stand against said injustices are in fact, detached from reality: this gives the erroneous aura of said people as being detached from reality, and hence: such injustices do not exist (except in the minds of over zealous science fiction shut-ins). Yes, believe it or not: The Matrix was a work of FICTION.
I keep asking myself: why is it that so many people hate feminism, and yet it is everywhere you go? Why is it that so many people see how clearly biased things are against men, and yet nobody does anything about it?
The answer to these questions and permutations thereof is also simple:
The assault against those things has already been polluted by clever people (Mentally Retarded Asswipes - MRA's) who are "attempting" to make those who stand against them look like total fools.
They are succeeding.
Why would any man in his right mind join a group of people who appear to be a motley crew of nerdy science fiction shut-ins?
This is why we constantly are beaten over the head with the "red-pill" "blue-pill" analogy in the Mental Retard Movement (MRM). It is a clever rouse to discredit those who stand against feminist injustice.
Keep up the good work sh*t-heads. I am tracking you down like dogs as you read this.
And do not worry, I realize that many MRA's have a sincere desire for justice and truth. However, there are a small few (very clever and evil people) who are misleading those people into making themselves look like fools.It is that small few that I am hunting down (I have already hired private investigators to find out who EXACTLY these people are, and their COMPLETE background).
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
This is a lie.
I keep asking myself: why is it that so many people hate feminism, and yet it is everywhere you go? Why is it that so many people see how clearly biased things are against men, and yet nobody does anything about it?
The answer to these questions and permutations thereof is also simple:
The assault against those things has already been polluted by clever people (Mentally Retarded Asswipes - MRA's) who are "attempting" to make those who stand against them look like total fools.
They are succeeding.
Why would any man in his right mind join a group of people who appear to be a motley crew of nerdy science fiction shut-ins?
This is why we constantly are beaten over the head with the "red-pill" "blue-pill" analogy in the Mental Retard Movement (MRM). It is a clever rouse to discredit those who stand against feminist injustice.
Keep up the good work sh*t-heads. I am tracking you down like dogs as you read this.
LIKE DOGS!
And do not worry, I realize that many MRA's have a sincere desire for justice and truth. However, there are a small few (very clever and evil people) who are misleading those people into making themselves look like fools.
Monday, May 2, 2011
The Men's Rights Movement in a Nutshell
The Men's Rights Movement. Just flush when you're done morons.
The-Spearhead finally showed its true colors: actually COLOR. And that color was WHITE. I am writing up a piece on it.
I'll have to put my coming video on hold.
The reason feminism is thriving so much is because of the MRM and MRAs. There is no question about it in my mind. I now believe that some of the front runners are actually concocting this farce by design! I think I can prove it too.
Read about it soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)